In the article ‘French veil law: Muslim
woman’s challenge in Strasbourg’ from BBC news, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25118160 the writer reported about a
young Muslim woman challenging France's full face veil ban at the European
Court of Human Rights. French city of Strasbourg banned the public wearing of
most face coverings in 2011, setting fines for offenders up to 150 euros.
The Paris Appeals Court overturned a high
court decision by ruling that a private nursery school had been justified in
firing an assistant director who refused to remove her Islamic headscarf at
work. Fatima Afif, the young Muslim woman, argues that the niqab and the burka
body covering accord with her religious faith, culture, and personal
convictions, and denies being forced by her family to wear them. However, the
head of the International League for Women's Rights said that the full-face
veil constitutes a true deletion of the woman as an individual in public. The
law is democratic and backed by a strong conviction among French public and
states that wearing the full veil makes it difficult to identify a person and
makes her indistinguishable from other full veil wearers and erases the woman
who wears it, a government lawyer said. A British lawyer representing an
unnamed French Muslim said the law violated his client's freedoms of religion,
free speech, privacy, rights and made her feel like a prisoner in her own
country. Some human rights campaigners have condemned the French law. Amnesty International
argued that it violates women's rights to freedom of expression and religion.
This
topic seems the most interesting to me as the practice of Muslim women wearing
veils is being rejected by some countries around the world. France banned the full
face covering veils, but not the hijab. Turkey once banned all for a while,
even headscarves. Tunisia banned headscarves in 1981.Syria banned headscarves
in universities. I personally cover myself but not my face. To my point of
view, I see the veil as a freedom that can not be banned especially by those
who do not have any experience wearing it. Most Muslim women testify that the
way they dress is not at all forced by their families especially by their male
relatives.
The majority of Muslim women wear the veil
because they choose to wear it. Further, by doing so they obey the religion as it
is stated in the Quran: “And tell the
believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts
and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof
and to wrap [a portion of] their head covers over their chests and not expose
their adornment except ...” (24:31). The practice of women covering
themselves is not only an Islamic practice. This way of dressing is stated in
other religious scripture as well. For example, the Bible: “For if a woman is not veiled, let her also
be shorn: but if it is a shame to a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be
veiled.” (1 Corinthians 11:6)
France is a secular nation, meaning that
people of any religion should be allowed to practice what they believe as long
their actions do not break any existing laws. Freedom of religion in France is
guaranteed by the constitutional rights set forth in the 1789 Declaration of
the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. I do not see why the veil should be
banned especially as a reason to protect a woman’s right. When the wearer
speaks about the reasons she wears the full veil and states it is not at all
oppresses to her, why do others need to speak on her behalf?
Regarding this practice, my opinion is that
people need to understand why most Muslim women dress the way they do. I wear
it most importantly because of my religious obligation. I believe in God and I
do what He asked me to do. The main reason why Muslims women were asked to wear
it is to make them easier to be identified as followers of Islam. This should
answer the concern about wearing full veil making it difficult to identify a
person. Covered Muslims are identifiable, as a Muslim. I do not think it is
important to distinguish a person based on their physical appearance.
Intellect, skills, and attitude are more than enough to describe a person,
especially in a work place.
Some say the veil is oppression and they
need freedom. One of my personal reasons to wear veil and dress modestly is to
set my self free from worries about impressing others through my beauty. Covering
myself gives me self-respect. How others think of me as beautiful or not is
none of my business. I do not need others to tell me how beautiful I am to
realize the fact. I free myself from being judged based on my appearance,
especially by men. As a human, I want people to judge me based on my intellect,
not my physical appearance. When I speak, I want people to focus on my words, not
my body. This is the true liberation and true freedom, especially to those who
choose to wear.
The only freedom Muslim women want is to
have equal rights as a human. They do not need others to tell them how to dress
or force to remove their veil. To ban the veil is actually the oppression. Finally,
some argued that Muslim women, like everyone else, need to be recognized for
security purpose. According to an article about the same topic from Al-Jazeera
America, a Muslim woman, in her written evidence, said that she is willing to
remove the face veil whenever required for security reasons. Therefore, to ban
the face-veil completely in public, to me, is not a just law.
The authors of both articles from BBC News
and Al-Jazeera America did their job effectively by considering arguments from
both parties. I do not sense any bias in their articles but they should have
discussed more reasons the French Government ban modest dresses but not
nakedness at Cap d'Agde which now the world's capital of nudism.
No comments:
Post a Comment